Thought this was a rather good blog. Not all new ideas are good ones, and not all criticism or doubt is misplaced or cynical.
Following all the discussions at the ResearchEd conference last weekend, I’ve been thinking about the balance we need to strike when presented with new ideas or when we’re presenting them ourselves. We need to be open to the possibility that a strategy might be a good one whilst remaining confident that, as professionals, we’ll be able to discuss the evidence and challenge the idea if necessary.
As I describe in my talk and blog about barriers to effective CPD, the two ends of the spectrum are equally problematic. The hyper-puppy evangelists often put up defenses that are difficult to deal with. They can take it personally if you burst their bubble of wild enthusiasm with any suggestion that you’re not entirely on-board. Similarly the jaded eye-rollers of doom can kill the spirit of any number of exploratory initiatives before they’ve had a chance to…
View original post 1,005 more words